C. STANDING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE (SDC):
1. Director/ Principal of each college shall constitute a Standing Disciplinary Committee headed by Chief Proctor/ Senior faculty member and shall consists of total 5 or 7 faculty members (having representation of all major departments) with one Proctor as member secretary.
2. The committee shall act as the highest body at college level to deal with the indisciplinary cases of students.
3. When a student has been found accused guilty of serious criminal charges, gave misconduct, persistent negligence of work or misbehavior, the Chief Proctor, after prima-facie verifying the involvement of the accused, shall recommend the case to Director/ Principal for immediate suspension of such student pending enquiry.
4. During the period of suspension
i. The student will not be allowed to participate in any activity of the college except University examination for which the university shall be intimated in advance.
ii. The Chief Warden/ Warden of the Hostel (if the student is hosteller) may suspend or remove from the hostel with the approval of the Director/ Principal.
5. Soon after suspension, the case will be referred to the SDC of the college for detailed enquiry.
6. Before punishing/penalizing the student the committee should provide the opportunity of proper hearing of all parties/students.
7. The SDC will meet at the earliest and after due consideration, recommend suitable punishment on the basis of severity of the act/ involvement of the student. The punishment may be explored in such a way that natural law of justice and the discipline could be ensured simultaneously.
8. The recommendations of the SDC shall be put before the Director/ Principal for approval. However, the Director/ Principal, if he is of the opinion that the case merits’ review, may refer the case back to the SDC for reconsideration.
9. Various ways of penalizing students (at the wisdom of the committee) may be as below:
i. Issue Warning and observe conduct of the student.
ii. Depriving the student from certain facilities for a reasonable duration.
iii. Deduction of DECA marks.
iv. Expulsion from hostel.
v. Financial Penalty (normally should not exceed 25% of the annual fee unless some financial loss to the institute is done by the student/s.)
vi. Suspension from attending classes for a reasonable period.
vii. Suspension from the college for a reasonable period not more than one (current) semester.
However, in all such cases parents of defaulter/ accused students must be informed/ heard.
10. In case the severity of the act demands the punishment that leads to:
a. Year loss of student
b. The financial penalty that is more than the said amount
c. Rustication from the college
All such cases shall be referred to Dean (SW) with the recommendations of the proposed penalty/ punishment proposed by the SDC, till then the defaulter student/s may be penalized as above (i to vii).
11. However, the Chief Proctor/ Chief Warden of the college may deal with the indiscipline cases of minor nature/ less severe at their own level (without SDC) with the consent of Principal/ Director.
12. If a criminal case has been registered in a court of law by the Police (State), the student shall be suspended immediately pending enquiry.
13. The appealing authority against the decision of College Standing Disciplinary Committee shall be the HVC whose decision shall be considered as final and binding to all.
14. Before appealing to HVC for mercy, the penalized student may first appeal to Director/ Principal to review the earlier decision/ penalty. Director/ Principal, looking into the career of the student, may revise the decision by imposing certain condition/s, and/or taking affidavit from the student and his parents.
15. Dean (SW) shall resolve all such appeals (on the direction of HVC) and all such cases referred by colleges, through “Student Grievance Redressal Council”.
16. Recommendation/s of the Council shall be put before the HVC for the approval which shall be final and binding to all. However, the Vice Chancellor, if is of the opinion that the case merits’ review, may refer the case back to the Council for reconsideration.
D. STUDENT’S GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL:
As per the AICTE Notification issued vide F. No. 35-3/Legal/2012 Dated 25.05.2012 [ANNEXURE: III], the term “Student Grievance” refers to the grievance at individual level, which has occurred because of some oversight on the part of institution/ university, its administration/ employees, students etc., which lead to some discontent or dissatisfaction on the part of student(s). In order to ensure transparency by Technical Institutions imparting technical education, in admission and with Paramount Objectives of preventing unfair practices, all colleges/ institutions are required to provide a mechanism to innocent students for redressal of their grievances.
1. Students’ Grievance Redressal Committee: A five member committee is to be constituted by the Director/ Principal (with the information to Dean, SW) for each college or group of colleges of the same society.
2. Various objectives of formation of this Committee are:
i. To promote and maintain a conducive and unprejudiced environment if students are facing any infringement of their rights.
ii. To develop responsive and accountable attitude among the institute/ university officials to ensure that, there is no laxity in terms of fair deals with the students.
3. The committee shall deal all such grievances received by the college administration in time bound manner.
4. In case the committee fails to do so or the student feels dissatisfied then such student may approach to Dean (SW) for redressal of his/ her grievance/s. Dean (SW) shall resolve all such case through “Student Grievance Redressal Council”.
5. The concern college shall provide all the relevant information/ proceedings to the Council related with the grievance. The Council may ask the college administration to send the concerned faculty/ officer and/ or the student to present the case before the Council.
6. The Council shall submit its recommendation for the approval of HVC which shall be final and binding to all. However, the Vice Chancellor, if he is of the opinion that the case merits’ review, may refer the case back to the Council for reconsideration.
E. ANTI RAGGING CELL:
[To be read along with the UGC Public Notice issued vide No. F. 1-127/2011 (Anti Ragging) “Curbing the Menace of Ragging in Higher Educational Institutions”] : [ANNEXURE: I]
1. Ragging is prohibited and punishable under the UGC Regulations on “Curbing the Menace of Ragging in Higher Educational Institutions (2009)” as issued and amended by the UGC from time to time.
2. Each college shall take all the measures as provided in the gazette notification in true spirit. Preventing ragging and dealing with the ragging cases in sensible manner is the sole responsibility of the concerned college.
F. WOMEN CELL:
[To be read along with the ACT “The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibititon and Redressal) Act, 2013: No. 14 of 2013, Dated 22nd April 2013]. : [ANNEXURE: II]
As per the Chapter II of above act:
1. Each college shall constitute an “Internal Complaints Committee” to look after the welfare issues and redressal of women harassment cases and shall inform the constitution of the committee to University.
2. The Committee shall consist of one senior lady faculty/ women social worker as chairperson and three to four other members including teaching/ non teaching staff (both male and female).
3. The committee shall work as per the guidelines issued by Hon’ble Supreme Court/ UGC/ other Regulatory Bodies from time to time in this regard.
Dean
Students’ Welfare